Choose JPG
Best for photographs, marketplace uploads, email attachments, and cases where broad compatibility matters more than transparency.
Format Guide
If you are choosing between WEBP, JPG, and PNG, the right answer depends on what the image needs to do. File size, transparency, compression artifacts, compatibility, and editing workflow all matter.
Best for photographs, marketplace uploads, email attachments, and cases where broad compatibility matters more than transparency.
Best for screenshots, logos, overlays, interface graphics, and any asset that needs a transparent background.
Best for modern web delivery when you want smaller files than PNG or JPG while staying visually close to the original.
JPG is a lossy format designed for photos. It usually produces smaller files, but repeated exports can soften detail and add compression artifacts around edges and text. That is why JPG is often the right delivery format for photos but not the best working format for layered graphics.
PNG uses lossless compression and supports transparency. It keeps sharp edges cleaner, which makes it useful for logos, screenshots, and text-heavy visuals. The trade-off is that PNG files can get large quickly, especially for big photographs.
WEBP is a newer web-focused format that can handle both lossy and lossless compression. In many web publishing cases it gives you a smaller file than PNG or JPG at similar visual quality, but some third-party systems still prefer older formats like JPG or PNG.
If a platform rejects WEBP, convert it to JPG. If a large PNG photo is making your page heavy, convert it to WEBP. If a transparent asset turned black after export, convert it back to PNG or WEBP instead of JPG so alpha transparency stays intact.
Use the image converter to switch formats in the browser, and the image resizer if you also need new output dimensions before download. For logo files and overlays that need transparency, use the transparent background tool before the final export.